data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23604/236043affdc60c1ffc501e42fd4a373109a5edda" alt="New Scientist. Science news and long reads from expert journalists, covering developments in science, technology, health and the environment on the website and the magazine."
Earth isn’t doing so nice. Due to human-induced local weather change, the seas are warming and rising, whereas the land – in lots of locations – is alternately choked in drought or inundated with floods. As for us people, we’re engaged in warfare on a number of continents, far-right actions are ascendant the world over and, as of final month, “dude wipes” can be found with a pumpkin spice scent in america.
In the meantime, the escape hatch to area is creaking open. Elon Musk’s firm SpaceX has a rising fleet of low-cost, reusable rockets. In October, the booster stage for its mega-rocket, Starship, was caught within the grip of a skyscraper-high tower because it descended again to Earth. It was a powerful feat. However Musk’s aim with these automobiles is much more audacious: to start out a self-sustaining million-person metropolis on Mars within the subsequent 30 years.
Has anybody actually thought this by means of? Properly, sure, because it occurs, albeit not Musk. We’re a wife-and-husband analysis crew – a biologist and cartoonist, respectively – and we have now spent 4 years trying into how people will develop into area settlers for our newest ebook, A City on Mars. We got down to write the important information to a wonderful off-world future. What we realized, nonetheless, made us area settlement sceptics.
Right here’s the factor: Mars sucks. If you dig into what life would actually appear to be on the Purple Planet, by way of the squishy particulars of human existence, it turns into laborious to keep away from an inconvenient conclusion – that shifting to Mars to flee Earth can be like shifting…