Fifty-seven years in the past, three American astronauts set forth on probably the most audacious and galvanizing journeys in human historical past.
In late December 1968, NASA astronauts Frank Borman, James Lovell, and William Anders launched to the moon aboard Apollo 8, changing into the primary people to interrupt freed from Earth’s gravity and journey to a different world.
In a bold decision, stunning in both its simplicity and audacity, NASA chose to “bet the farm” to blunt Soviet lunar ambitions in the space race to the moon. Still recovering from 1967’s devastating Apollo 1 launch pad fire that killed three astronauts (including Mercury astronaut Gus Grissom), the space agency abandoned its careful, methodical building-block approach of increasingly complex Apollo Earth orbital missions and threw a “Hail Mary pass.”
Hail Mary to the moon
Around Christmas 1968, the United States would launch Apollo 8 to orbit the moon on the first crewed flight of the Saturn V – then the most powerful rocket ever built – in a small spacecraft powered by a single engine that absolutely had to work.
It was brilliant. It took guts. And it was extraordinarily risky.
No space mission before or since had such a clear and uncomplicated objective. Two and a half hours after launch came words never before spoken during a space mission: “Apollo 8, you are GO for TLI” (trans-lunar insertion). They were “go” for the moon.
Historian Dwayne A. Day, who has written extensively on Cold War space history and intelligence programs, places NASA’s decision in perspective.
“Frank Borman has said a CIA report (contending the Soviet Union was planning a manned lunar flyby by year’s end) led to Apollo 8’s mission to orbit the moon. But nothing I’ve found proves that,” Day said. “What is clear is that the Lunar Module wasn’t ready, and NASA wasn’t going to hold Apollo 8 on the ground. In the moon race, NASA had the gas pedal pressed to the floor and it didn’t matter if the Soviet Union was gaining on them in their rear-view mirror, they were not going to slow down.”
After a 3-day journey, Borman, Lovell, and Anders fired Apollo 8’s single Service Propulsion System engine to slow their spacecraft as it approached the moon, allowing lunar gravity to capture them into orbit.
From just 60 miles above the surface, the astronauts became the first humans to gaze upon the moon’s stark mountains and cratered plains. Then came a moment none of them expected: the blue marble of earth rising above the lunar horizon. In a single photograph — the now-iconic “Earthrise” — humanity saw itself from a quarter-million miles away, fragile and alone in the darkness.
On Christmas Eve, the crew aimed their black-and-white television camera at the lunar surface, broadcasting grainy images of craters and ancient seas drifting silently below. As families around the world paused their holiday celebrations, the astronauts unexpectedly began reading from the Book of Genesis: “In the beginning, God created the heaven and the Earth…”
The fusion of ancient scripture, the spirit of the season, and the stark beauty of the moon transformed the television broadcast into an indelible moment. For many, Christmas Eve 1968 would forever be remembered as “the lunar Christmas.”
As the new year approached, the gallant crew of Apollo 8 returned safely to Earth, their mission hailed as an inspirational and extraordinary accomplishment. Time Magazine halted its presses to name Borman, Lovell, and Anders “Men of the Year.” A telegram to the astronauts captured the mood succinctly: “You saved 1968.”
Andrew Chaikin, author of “A Man on the Moon: The Voyages of the Apollo Astronauts,” later mirrored on the Apollo period.
“How might essentially the most futuristic factor people had ever achieved be to date previously? Within the narrative of the House Age, Apollo is a chapter that feels jarringly out of sequence.”
Artemis 2 to the moon
Today, NASA stands on the edge of a new lunar chapter. Artemis 2 — the first crewed mission of the Artemis program — is scheduled for launch in early 2026. The 10-day flight will carry astronauts around the moon to test the Orion spacecraft and Space Launch System rocket in deep space.
NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, and Christina Koch, along with Canadian astronaut Jeremy Hansen, will become the first humans to venture to the vicinity of the moon since 1972 aboard their Orion spacecraft, fittingly named “Integrity.”
Glen E. Swanson, former Johnson Space Center chief historian and author of the just-published book “Inspired Enterprise: How NASA, the Smithsonian, and the Aerospace Community Helped Launch Star Trek” attracts a direct parallel between Apollo 8 and immediately’s challenges.
“Apollo 8 was about leaving the Earth and Apollo 11 was about arriving on the moon,” Swanson mentioned. “As we glance from the vantage level of time, now that over half a century has handed since each of those occasions occurred, one may pause and ask which was extra essential?”
Swanson invokes the oft-repeated phrase “If we will land a person on the moon we will …” What can we do now as a nation aside from sit by and watch others, resembling China, return to the place we as soon as had been however cannot now instantly return even when we tried?”
“Apollo was politics at its greatest and, in consequence, NASA has each succeeded and suffered due to it,” Swanson mentioned. “It succeeded with its signature occasion – the technologically gorgeous and audaciously daring achievement of touchdown on the moon. However it has paid a really excessive value for that feat, particularly when it got here to formulating sustained long-range plans for human spaceflight.”
Day strikes an identical word in evaluating Apollo 8 to Artemis 2.
“Historical past would not echo, however generally it rhymes,” he mentioned. “Some historians have claimed that Apollo 8 was the true finish of the moon race. However that is solely as a result of the Soviet Union had no probability of touchdown a cosmonaut on the moon earlier than Apollo 11.”
“Right this moment, now we have an identical however completely different scenario — NASA might ship people across the moon once more, however China might nonetheless beat Artemis 3 to land on the moon. Will that basically matter? It might symbolize Chinese language ascendancy in expertise. However now we have many various measures of technological supremacy in comparison with the Nineteen Sixties, so it is unclear that the affect can be as nice as the primary race to the moon.”
NASA’s massive comeback?
Still, Apollo 8 offers a reminder that leadership in space is not defined solely by who arrives first, but by who dares to move forward when the outcome is uncertain. In 1968, three astronauts carried a divided world to the moon and, in doing so, helped a weary planet rediscover its sense of possibility. As Artemis 2 prepares to depart on a voyage “From the Earth to the Moon,” the question is not whether history can be repeated but whether its quiet courage can be summoned again.
