We’ve lengthy whispered in regards to the “5 Observables” and the theoretical capabilities of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP). However on September 9, 2025, the theoretical turned kinetic. Throughout a historic Home Oversight Committee listening to, the world witnessed what navy insiders have fiercely debated behind closed doorways for a decade: a direct, kinetic engagement between a U.S. navy asset and a non-human craft.
→ The October 30 Incident
The footage is grainy, monochrome and terrifyingly clear in its implications. Dated October 30, 2024, the declassified video was captured by the sensor suite of an MQ-9 Reaper drone working off the coast of Yemen. The goal was not a Houthi rebel or a weapons cache however a metallic, spherical object hovering with eerie stillness in opposition to the chaotic backdrop of a battle zone.
Rep. Eric Burlison (R-MO) launched the footage to a shocked listening to room. It reveals a second MQ-9 drone acquiring a lock on the orb. A Hellfire missile—the apex of contemporary precision strike know-how—is launched. In any typical engagement, the end result is a foregone conclusion: influence, detonation and obliteration.
As an alternative, the legal guidelines of physics appeared to bend. The missile struck the orb and easily… bounced. There was no explosion. No particles discipline. The sphere didn’t crumple or fall. It absorbed the kinetic vitality of a Mach 1.3 influence and continued its trajectory, seemingly unaffected. As former Pentagon intelligence official Lue Elizondo famous through the evaluation, “We have by no means seen a Hellfire missile hit a goal and bounce off.”
→ Physics of the Not possible
This incident forces us to confront the terrifying actuality of the know-how we face. A Hellfire missile is designed to penetrate armor and destroy fortified buildings. When it strikes a stable object, the kinetic switch alone ought to be catastrophic. For an object to deflect such a strike implies one among two prospects:
- The article possesses a structural integrity that exceeds any identified materials science on Earth.
- The craft is protected by a localized discipline—gravitational or electromagnetic—that redirected the missile’s vitality on the level of influence.
The dearth of a detonation is equally baffling. Did the orb dampen the explosive set off? Or did the missile fail to acknowledge it had hit a legitimate floor? This “Invincible Orb” displayed a passive protection functionality that renders our most subtle air-to-ground weaponry out of date.
→ The Shift to Kinetic Engagement
For years, the narrative has been that UAP are observers. They watch our nuclear silos, shadow our service teams and monitor our wars. The Yemen incident shatters that passive picture. We’re now not simply watching them. We’re capturing at them. And we’re lacking.
This raises pressing questions in regards to the Guidelines of Engagement (ROE). Who licensed the strike? Was the orb displaying hostile intent or was this a “functionality probe” by U.S. forces to check the vulnerability of those craft? The truth that a Hellfire was expended suggests a choice was made at a excessive degree to deal with this object as a risk. The failure of that strike is a message we can not ignore.
→ A New Actuality
The September 2025 listening to will go down in historical past not only for the whistleblowers who testified however for the visible proof that ended the controversy on UAP physicality. These usually are not glitches. They don’t seem to be sensor ghosts. They’re stable, tangible machines that may shrug off our deadliest weapons like a mosquito chew.
As we transfer deeper into 2026, the implications of the Yemen Orb linger over each navy technique session within the Pentagon. If we can not shoot them down, we can not management our airspace. Disclosure is now not about confirming their existence. It’s about admitting our personal vulnerability.
.webp){kind=small}
