That is Half 3 in a collection on the mathematical universe speculation. Take a look at Components 1 and a pair of.
Starting within the 1980’s, one other physicist, Roger Penrose, got here up with what he referred to as the Triangle of Actuality, which sounds just like the nerdiest cult in historical past (and when later I get to speak in regards to the Pythagoreans you’ll see that I’m proper). The three corners of the triangle are math, matter, and thoughts. Now we have math, which seems to be a set of goal, summary truths (2+2=4 type of stuff). Now we have our minds, our subjective expertise of the world, and now we have matter, which is…the world.
So which is chargeable for which? Do our minds create math? Does matter create thoughts? How does all of it work? The mathematical universe idea breaks the triangle. It’s simply math. Math IS the universe, it IS matter.
And meaning math is thoughts.
In accordance with the mathematical college speculation, we – you and me and each aware being – are simply…equations. Relationships. Logical buildings. There’s nothing extra to us. What we expect is our aware, subjective expertise of the world (rising older, having fun with a slice of cheese, having that awkward second whenever you miss a high-five) is an phantasm. It’s all simply…math. A construction that by no means modifications, by no means evolves.
Contemplate the Mandelbrot set. It’s a fractal. You zoom in on anybody a part of it and also you simply get extra of the identical repeating patterns. It’s all ruled by an very simple equation, nevertheless it comprises an infinite quantity of complexity.
Think about writing down an equation that creates a fractal so advanced, so intricate that should you zoomed down into it far sufficient, you noticed a particularly difficult sample emerge, a construction that was so knotted up on itself that it was conscious of itself and its atmosphere.
Tegmark calls this the distinction between the fowl perspective and the frog perspective. From the perspective of the fowl, we will see the entire advanced manifestation of the maths. We are able to see these self-aware substructures, identical to we will see this stunning sample seem within the Mandelbrot set. However we don’t get that perspective. We’re IN the maths (as a result of we ARE manufactured from math), so we’re simply frogs. We are able to’t zoom out to see how our little nook of the mathematical sample is only one construction amongst many. We expect now we have our minds and the universe round us.
Sure, which means that there is no such thing as a free will. There’s not even previous and future. There’s no passage of time. There’s not even area. There’s simply math, simply equations. A set of logical, orderly relationships that exist. The sample of your life already exists. Should you have been a fowl, you can rise above and see your entire life performed out.
I’m going to make use of an analogy and I’ve to confess that it’s a nasty one. However I’m utilizing it as an example simply how wild this concept is. So take my hand, as a result of we’re going to crazytown. It’s like we’re characters in a online game. From our perspective, the world exists, we exist, stuff exists. We speak and giggle and transfer round. Nevertheless it’s all simply software program, simply logic and programming. There is no such thing as a “us” – there’s simply bits of code.
This analogy is unhealthy since you instantly consider both a) the matrix or b) the simulation argument. And that’s as a result of for this analogy to work you don’t simply want the software program, you want the {hardware}, the pc. Within the mathematical universe, there is no such thing as a {hardware}, no pc. There’s simply code.
Right here’s a barely higher analogy. It’s extra like we’re the characters in a narrative. From our perspective the story unfolds web page by web page, and we by no means know what comes subsequent. However the guide is already written, sure, and printed. It’s performed – it exists. Sure we’re actual, identical to the characters in a guide are actual, however we’re actually simply phrases on a web page.
2+2=4. You possibly can design a pc program to compute this. You possibly can shove a bunch of rocks collectively to reveal this. Nevertheless it’s nonetheless true, 2+2=4 even in a world with out computer systems and with out rocks. The mathematical construction doesn’t want a substrate (it doesn’t want an engine) to exist.
That’s….heavy stuff, man. Like I stated, enjoyable to consider. However as we begin to consider it, some questions come up (which can be why this type of stuff is enjoyable to consider).
And the primary query that involves thoughts is….hey, isn’t there lots of math on the market? Like, A LOT quite a bit? There are an unlimited array of POTENTIAL logical techniques that might describe ALL SORTS of potential universes. Like universes with 5 spatial dimensions, or 2 time dimensions, or 47 forces, or 15 variations of the electron, or a pace of sunshine that’s half of what we expertise, and on and on and on and on.
Tegmark has a solution for you. And that reply is second verse similar as the primary: the multiverse! That’s proper, there’s a universe for everyone. Each doable mathematical construction is realized and present all in parallel. We simply occur to occupy this one – we’re self-aware little subsets in a bigger mathematical framework – as a result of it’s the type that allowed sentient beings to come up.
Hey, isn’t that simply the anthropic precept? The universe is the best way it’s as a result of if it wasn’t the best way it’s then we wouldn’t be right here to see it?
Why, sure it’s.
And the second query involves us from none aside from the ultimate boss of arithmetic himself, Kurt Godel. Now Godel didn’t really critique Tegmark’s mathematical universe as a result of Godel has been useless for a very long time, however within the early twentieth century he did one thing outstanding: he confirmed that for any sufficiently advanced formal system, like arithmetic, there are statements which might be TRUE however can’t be confirmed.
I’m undoubtedly not going to get into the weeds of this one, however hey I’m up for the problem if anybody needs to ask. The purpose that issues for us is that there is no such thing as a mathematical system that’s COMPLETE (sure there are various, many technicalities that I’m glossing over, take care of it math nerds).
So look, buddy, you need the universe to be manufactured from math. That’s cute and all. however there’s no mathematical system that’s full, so how are you going to have a whole universe that truly capabilities as, you understand, a universe?
Tegmark has a solution for you right here too. Perhaps it’s not ALL doable mathematical buildings make up the multiverse, however solely the small subset of mathematical buildings which might be computable. In different phrases, the maths that’s our universe isn’t advanced sufficient to run into any Kurt Godel issues. We’re really juuuuust advanced sufficient to have sentience however easy sufficient to flee any issues with completeness.
Ta-da: a universe manufactured from math that solutions some main criticisms. We cool?
.webp){kind=small}
