Some of the elementary and curious mysteries within the universe is the truth that something exists in any respect. That’s as a result of in the course of the Huge Bang, equal quantities of matter and antimatter particles ought to have been created — antimatter being just like the “reverse” of standard matter, which means it is made up of antiprotons and antielectrons. And when matter and antimatter particles meet, they’re mutually annihilated.
Meaning in a universe break up up into matter and antimatter, giant constructions comparable to galaxies, stars, planets, moons and even our our bodies ought to wrestle to exist. Thus, some early quirk of the universe will need to have eradicated antimatter and allowed a matter-dominated cosmos to prosper. For a while, scientists have been keenly looking for proof of what any such occasion is likely to be.
Article continues below
“Primordial black holes are hypothetical black holes that formed soon after the Big Bang because of extreme, high-density fluctuations in the early universe. They are good candidates for being the seeds of supermassive black holes at the centers of massive galaxies, as well as of intermediate-mass black holes at the centers of globular clusters,” Poplawski told Space.com. “There are other models of elimination of antimatter, but they all assume some physics beyond the Standard Model of particle physics.
“The mass asymmetry between matter and antimatter was surprising, but it immediately suggested to me that it could be a simple and natural cause of the observed matter-antimatter imbalance in the universe.”
Was antimatter a drag in the earlier universe?
Poplawski explained how there are also unknown processes that violate the balance between a family of particles called baryons and their antimatter counterparts, the antibaryons.
“The mass asymmetry and the resulting black-hole capture asymmetry produced the matter–antimatter imbalance in the observable universe without violating the conservation of baryon number and invoking new physics beyond the Standard Model,” Poplawski explained.
The researcher says that because antimatter particles are more massive than matter particles, during pair production in the early universe, the antimatter particles were slower than the corresponding matter particles.
“Because the probability for gravitational capture of a massive particle by a black hole increases as its speed decreases, the antimatter particles were captured by black holes at larger rates than the corresponding matter particles,” Poplawski said. “The missing antimatter fell into primordial black holes and what did not fall was annihilated by matter.”
This could explain another problem in cosmology that has become pressing ever since the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) began spotting supermassive black holes around 500 million years after the Big Bang. This is an issue because the merger and feeding process that allows supermassive black holes to grow to masses of millions, or even billions, of times that of the sun were previously thought to take at least 1 billion years to reach fruition. Seeing supermassive black holes before the universe was 1 billion years old therefore presents a considerable puzzle.
Poplawski thinks that by gobbling up antimatter, primordial black holes could have gotten a head start on these growth processes.
“Primordial black holes consumed more antimatter than matter, and because antimatter was much heavier than matter, primordial black holes enormously increased their masses,” he said. “This could possibly explain how supermassive black holes recently observed in the early universe have grown so quickly.”
Of course, there is a long way to go before this theory is accepted by the scientific community at large. One thing that could aid in its acceptance is obtaining observational evidence of the existence of primordial black holes, which since they were first proposed by Stephen Hawking in the 1970s, have remained frustratingly hypothetical.
“Primordial black holes would have existed in the very early universe, which is currently very difficult to probe. I hope that gravitational waves and neutrinos could be possibly used in the future to test this hypothesis,” Poplawski said. “Also, there could be future experiments testing if matter and antimatter particles may have slightly different masses at higher densities or smaller distances compared to those currently probed. “In fact, some recent experiments showed that mesons and antimesons decay differently. This difference might be related to matter-antimatter mass asymmetry.”
Poplawski’s research is available on the preprint paper repository arXiv.
![[AURORA ALERT] GEOMAGNETIC WARNING doable G3 storm on the twenty third](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLGEpRXXwQHxE7DPILswNd_C-MIOZPILZv64HN-Xrkd9O6yMLAwJAj4cK61LUbVVhrZ1y_uOvG-jOSRAm1Qj0Q21__3WhJhEVFnRtTp07Rs4Ka0W1ce6tWiLGFxyJ_v92ZhBYzJ7vaZ12Wdm7FMbUH9SMJcbr6ceAuqep8nf4Cov-8Ky3FKh8/s320/Screenshot%202026-03-23%20182208.png){kind=small}
