The Pentagon’s New UFO, UAP Report is Taken to the Woodshed

“… that is essentially the most error-ridden and unsatisfactory
authorities report
I can recall studying throughout or after a long time of presidency service. All of us
make errors, however this report is an outlier by way of inaccuracies and
errors. Have been I reviewing this as a graduate scholar’s thesis it will
obtain a failing grade for failing to know the project, sloppy and
insufficient analysis, and flawed interpretation of the information.”

(UAP, the brand new time period for UFO). This
new report
is itself anomalous for a number of causes.

First, who ever heard of a authorities report being submitted months earlier than it
was due? Particularly one so rife with embarrassing errors in determined want of
further fact-checking and revision? Was AARO Director Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick
speeding to get the report out the door earlier than departing, maybe to make sure
that his successor couldn’t revise or reverse a few of the report’s
conclusions?

Second, this seems to be the primary AARO report submitted to Congress that
the Director of Nationwide Intelligence (DNI) didn’t log out on. I don’t know
why, however Avril Haines and her Workplace have been fairly proper to not on this case,
having spared themselves appreciable embarrassment within the course of.

Third, that is essentially the most error-ridden and unsatisfactory authorities report I
can recall studying throughout or after a long time of presidency service. All of us make
errors, however this report is an outlier by way of inaccuracies and errors.
Have been I reviewing this as a graduate scholar’s thesis it will obtain a
failing grade for failing to know the project, sloppy and insufficient
analysis, and flawed interpretation of the information. Hopefully, lengthy earlier than it was
submitted, the writer would have consulted his or her professor and obtained
some steering and course correction to stop such an unlucky end result.