SCOTT DETROW, HOST:
Right here with the second version of our area information roundup with our pals from Quick Wave and the science desk, host Regina Barber and NPR science correspondent Nell Greenfieldboyce are right here. And, Nell, welcome to a phase final time round we determined we’d name Spacing Out with Scott. So let’s begin with the vital query. Do you’re keen on that, or do you hate it?
REGINA BARBER, BYLINE: (Laughter).
NELL GREENFIELDBOYCE, BYLINE: I imply, I prefer it as a reputation. I strive to not area out once I’m speaking with you, however, I imply, you may area out if you wish to, I suppose.
BARBER: (Laughter) Yeah, she’s knowledgeable, OK?
DETROW: So I’ve a suspicion of what we’re speaking about at this time, given how a lot area information I talked with Nell in current weeks, however what’s on the desk?
GREENFIELDBOYCE: Properly, for one factor, we’ll speak concerning the success of the Artemis II mission, however extra importantly, we’ll sit up for what’s in retailer for the following Artemis missions.
BARBER: Sure, and we’re additionally going to speak about water on an interstellar comet and what that tells scientists concerning the unknown photo voltaic system it got here from, plus what seismic information tells us concerning the energy of eclipses.
DETROW: All proper, nice. Nell, I’ve been in Artemis II withdrawal. That was such…
BARBER: (Laughter) It was intense.
DETROW: It was such a uncommon enjoyable story to cowl. It was the primary time individuals ventured out to the moon in 5 many years. The mission, by and enormous, went very well.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: And we have been each on dwell collectively for the launch and the splashdown.
DETROW: I do know, we’re simply going to need to superimpose a rocket blasting off behind you for this as a result of that was such a cool second final time.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: Yeah.
DETROW: You realize, not all the time, however, you understand, when it occurs, it is nice. However I believe one key factor that made this such a phenomenon of a narrative is that the astronauts actually appear to be having a enjoyable time doing it.
BARBER: Yeah. They usually took, like, attractive photographs. They broke a document for going the furthest individuals have ever gone from Earth.
DETROW: However the vital caveat that we all the time needed to work in after we talked about this was the truth that they by no means really landed on the moon.
BARBER: No, no, no. The crew capsule cannot land. In truth, I learn that the astronauts want one other automobile to do this – proper, Nell?
GREENFIELDBOYCE: Proper. So Jared Isaacman, he is the top of NASA who took cost a couple of months in the past. He is this businessman and a non-public astronaut. Anyway, he has been attempting to hurry up the 2 corporations which have contracts with NASA to develop a lunar lander, so the {hardware} they should land on the moon. These are – SpaceX and Blue Origin are the businesses.
DETROW: Any sense once they suppose they could have a lander prepared?
GREENFIELDBOYCE: It is arduous to know since these business corporations are inclined to maintain issues as non-public as they will, though generally stuff simply occurs. So for instance, Blue Origin simply had an issue with the higher stage of its new Glenn rocket. I imply, they didn’t put a satellite tv for pc into the precise orbit, after which the Federal Aviation Administration grounded the rocket whereas there’s an investigation. So there’s been a whole lot of chatter about how all that would decelerate Blue Origin’s work to assist the moon touchdown effort.
However anyway, NASA has stated that they plan to check one or possibly even each landers subsequent 12 months. And so the essential thought is to launch the crew capsule with astronauts on board, then launch one or each landers in order that they will form of rendezvous with the lander and attempt to, you understand, strive issues out in area, however do all of it near Earth. So they’d be trying out propulsion, life assist, all that form of stuff.
DETROW: And is the pondering that if that works effectively, then they will go forward with a mission after that and attempt to land on the moon, stroll on the moon?
GREENFIELDBOYCE: Yeah, I imply, NASA says the touchdown might occur as quickly as 2028. However, you understand, there are nearly all the time delays within the area enterprise. Nonetheless, NASA is actively getting ready for floor operations on the moon. They’ve even been doing observe simulations with the Artemis II astronauts who simply got here again, like Christina Koch.
(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)
CHRISTINA KOCH: Once we acquired again to Earth, all of us, inside one or two days, have been in floor spacewalk fits, doing floor geology duties and doing them effectively.
BARBER: That will need to have been so cool to, like, go well with up after which fake to be, like, finding out moon rocks on the lunar floor, having simply been so near the precise moon.
DETROW: One different factor I wish to point out about Artemis was that actually cool second the place they acquired to witness a photo voltaic eclipse from area…
BARBER: Yeah.
DETROW: …The moon passing in entrance of the solar.
BARBER: Yeah.
DETROW: It was so cool to see these photos, and that, after all, additionally jogged my memory concerning the photo voltaic eclipse close to and expensive to our hearts, April 2024, only a few years in the past, such a joyous second. I actually loved it. And, Gina, I’m joyful to listen to that we’ll be speaking eclipses for the following subject.
BARBER: Yeah, we completely are, and we’ll discuss seismic exercise.
DETROW: OK.
BARBER: So, Nell, you noticed the photo voltaic eclipse, too, proper?
GREENFIELDBOYCE: In fact, I noticed the full photo voltaic eclipse. I am not going to overlook that.
DETROW: I went with my children’ faculty standing out on the sector in entrance of the college with a bunch of youngsters observing it, and it was nice.
BARBER: Yeah.
DETROW: It was a enjoyable day.
BARBER: I do not know if this occurred to you all, however, like, I noticed the full photo voltaic eclipse in Buffalo. Everybody was, like, tremendous excited. They have been, like, actually loud. After which when totality occurred – that is when the moon absolutely covers the solar and when you may see that ghostly corona flickering round it – everybody acquired actually nonetheless, actually quiet. And this stillness was recorded by seismometers throughout North America.
BENJAMIN FERNANDO: Individuals have been altering their conduct in an effort to exit and consider the eclipse. And that is actually the primary time that anybody has checked out human conduct by means of seismics and acoustics that I am conscious of throughout an occasion like a photo voltaic eclipse.
BARBER: In order that’s Benjamin Fernando, a planetary scientist at Los Alamos Nationwide Lab, and Benjamin and his crew discovered that within the cities that have been within the path of totality, like, the place you would see that complete photo voltaic eclipse, it was seismically quiet. So seismometers choose up noise from all types of issues, like vehicles driving round city, you understand, constructions, even music live shows.
DETROW: Proper. And I all the time get pleasure from tales like this since you’ll choose up – you understand, like, you will see {that a} massive live performance, like a Taylor Swift live performance…
BARBER: Sure.
DETROW: …Truly has seismic exercise. So that is form of like that, however the complete reverse?
BARBER: Sure. Yeah, yeah. So I do not forget that Taylor Swift live performance, too. It was actually cool. It was really round, like, 2.3 magnitude earthquake, I believe, is what they recorded.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: As a result of they have been leaping up and down, proper?
BARBER: Properly, it is ‘trigger they have been singing, too, like, their simply motion and swaying. And Benjamin stated that seismometers are in a position to detect how quiet the whole lot turns into. It is a good reminder that these instruments can serve one other function, like to assist us perceive noise air pollution and the way it impacts our well being and our surroundings.
DETROW: Final subject, we’ve not gone interstellar but in Spacing Out.
BARBER: No, not but.
DETROW: We’re doing it now – 3I/ATLAS, one among a few interstellar objects that got here our approach not too long ago. There’s some information. What is going on on?
BARBER: Yeah, so this can be a comet that fashioned outdoors of our photo voltaic system, and it was simply discovered zooming by means of ours final July. And presently it is in between Jupiter and Saturn ‘trigger it is nonetheless in our photo voltaic system. And after finding out it for some time, astronomers suppose they know a bit bit extra about the place it got here from.
DETROW: The place?
BARBER: (Laughter) It was someplace colder than right here, than our photo voltaic system.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: Wait, how do they know that?
BARBER: Yeah, to allow them to have a look at the water evaporating from the floor of the comet utilizing an array of radio telescopes in Chile. So scientists discovered that in contrast with comets made in our photo voltaic system, 3I/ATLAS has water that is completely different. Particularly, it is acquired extra of this so-called semi-heavy water, and that is water with a barely altered make-up. And which means it most likely fashioned in a colder setting. So it is doubtless that it comes from a photo voltaic system that fashioned otherwise than our personal.
DETROW: How shut does that get scientists to understanding, although, which particular star system it got here from?
BARBER: It actually would not. So they do not know that.
DETROW: OK.
BARBER: However this data actually helps scientists examine future interstellar comets and to see if they’ve the identical water composition as a result of lately, scientists have gotten higher at detecting these interstellar objects, and it appears doubtless that they will discover extra. So alongside the way in which, they will ask, like, is the water composition widespread, this one which we have seen in 3I/ATLAS, or is it distinctive? Are we distinctive?
DETROW: Regina, you are distinctive.
BARBER: Aw.
DETROW: Don’t fret about it.
BARBER: Thanks.
DETROW: That’s Regina Barber and Nell Greenfieldboyce of NPR’s science podcast Quick Wave. You may test it out. They discuss science on a regular basis – not simply area, the opposite sciences as effectively. Because of each of you.
BARBER: Thanks.
GREENFIELDBOYCE: Thanks.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
Copyright © 2026 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.
Accuracy and availability of NPR transcripts could range. Transcript textual content could also be revised to appropriate errors or match updates to audio. Audio on npr.org could also be edited after its authentic broadcast or publication. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.
