Authorities Whistleblower Reveals He Watched It

Confirms the Existence of a Recording of a UFO Interfering with a Dummy
Nuclear Warhead in Flight in September 1964

BACKGROUND:

Based on two former US Air Drive officers—Lieutenant Bob Jacobs and Main Florenze Mansmann—a USAF photographic staff based mostly at Vandenberg AFB, California, tasked with filming missile check launches, inadvertently captured the picture of a domed, disc-shaped UFO because it circled after which disabled—with 4 flashes of an intense beam of sunshine—a dummy nuclear warhead flying downrange over the Pacific Ocean. Jacobs had been in command of the telescopic pictures website situated at Large Sur, California, and Mansmann was Vandenberg’s chief photographic imagery analyst.

By Robert Hastings The UFO Chronicles 2-9-2024

The date of the dramatic incident was September 15, 1964. Two days later, a
highly-restricted screening of the spectacular footage occurred on the
base—attended by Jacobs, Mansmann, and two CIA officers who instantly
categorised the occasion Prime Secret. The movie was then confiscated by the pair and
flown “again East” for evaluation and storage, in accordance with Main Mansmann. The
vacation spot was undoubtedly the CIA’s Nationwide Photographic Interpretation
Middle (NPIC) which, it’s now identified, had already engaged in UFO photograph evaluation
for years.

By the early Nineteen Eighties, Jacobs felt that sufficient time had handed following the
gorgeous UFO encounter to permit him to debate it publicly. He has defined
that, on the time of the 1964 movie screening at Vandenberg, Main Mansmann had
solely ordered him “to not speak about” the sudden filming of the UFO with
anybody, pointedly saying that it had “by no means occurred”. No point out was made from
its Prime Secret classification, for causes that stay unclear to the previous
Lieutenant. Moreover, as a result of the 2 officers misplaced contact with one another
after leaving the Air Drive, 19 years handed earlier than Mansmann was ready affirm
to Jacobs that the 2 mysterious males in civilian garments on the screening
had been the truth is CIA personnel.

In any case, in 1982, Jacobs wrote an article in regards to the extraordinary occasion
which, sadly, was revealed within the sensationalistic
Nationwide Enquirer tabloid, after OMNI journal had rejected it.
Shortly after the story appeared, Dr. Jacobs—by then a college professor
specializing in Communications—started getting demise threats from unidentified
individuals who repeatedly harassed him over the phone. He additionally acquired
intimidating letters from sure well-known UFO “skeptics” who tried to
get Jacobs to retract the story. The suspicious, unpublicized connections
these people had with the US Authorities can be mentioned in Half 2 of
this text.

I first interviewed Jacobs in 1986, along with my long-term analysis
into UFO-related exercise at nuclear weapons websites, as summarized in my ebook,
UFOs and Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters at Nuclear Weapons Sites.
In 2021, Luis “Lue” Elizondo, the previous director of a previously-secret UFO
mission on the Pentagon—the Superior Aerospace Menace Identification Program
(AATIP)—confirmed in a
podcast

that his group had utilized the ebook as a useful resource when conducting its personal
analysis into UFO incursions at nuclear weapon websites. Mentioned Elizondo, “There
was a number of data we didn’t have entry to that, it turned out, Robert
Hastings did…We had been in a position to validate and substantiate precisely what he was
saying.”

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS:

In February 2023, a US Senate investigator—who has requested to stay
nameless—instructed me that Elizondo had privately confirmed having been given
entry to the Large Sur UFO movie whereas with AATIP, and that it confirmed precisely
what Dr. Jacobs has maintained through the years: A UFO really interfered with
an Atlas missile in flight, because it carried a dummy nuclear warhead aloft. The
official Air Drive video of the encounter captures the second the unknown
object seems to interact the warhead with a luminous beam—which turned on and
off 4 instances—because it travelled downrange at a number of thousand miles-per-hour
over the Pacific Ocean.

The Senate investigator, realizing of my analysis, had beforehand organized a
teleconference between Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick—then the pinnacle of the All-domain Anomaly
Decision Workplace (AARO)—and myself, to coordinate the scheduling of
interviews by AARO staffers of a number of of my sources, all former/retired USAF
personnel who had labored with or guarded nuclear missiles. These interviews
started in January 2023, as famous in an earlier
article
of mine.

Concerning Elizondo’s admission about having watched the Large Sur UFO video—it
was on a DVD—the Senate investigator, whereas accompanying Elizondo to and from
AARO, mentioned Elizondo’s interview was performed by Dr. Kirkpatrick himself, on
February 2, 2023. Throughout that briefing, the previous AATIP director confirmed
the existence of the video, the small print concerning what it confirmed, and the
location of a replica of it in AATIP’s workspaces.

The Senate investigator subsequently wrote to me on April 27, 2023, saying,

Robert – Sean has instructed me that [when he searched] for the Large Sur video within the
protected drawer the place Lue instructed him to look, [it] was “empty”. He additionally claimed to
me that there’s an evidence for this occasion – particularly, a check of an ABM
missile (like Nike?) that day. I instructed Lue about this and he virtually
screamed “bullshit”. Thought it’s best to know that we’re nowhere on this difficulty
with AARO. Discovering a replica of that video is de facto essential.

It is usually essential to notice that the Pentagon has beforehand admitted it
destroyed all of Elizondo’s information and emails after he resigned his place in
protest, the autumn of 2017. This extremely uncommon transfer by the Pentagon is in
direct violation of a authorized Preservation Order that was mandated based mostly on
Elizondo’s different duties on the time. The order requires all of Elizondo’s
digital and onerous copy information to be preserved indefinitely, together with electronic mail
and correspondence.

Considerably, extra affirmation exists concerning Elizondo’s admission
about having seen the video of the unique movie whereas with AATIP. On November
10, 2023, a highly-reliable supply—who I’m not at liberty to determine—instructed me
that UAP whistleblower David Grusch has privately confirmed that Elizondo additionally
instructed him about having screened the Large Sur movie, and that it did certainly
seize an incredible, UFO-related, dummy warhead-interference occasion.

Whereas assigned to the UAP Taskforce, from 2019-21, Grusch apparently went so
far as to have a colleague search one Division of Protection archive, the
Protection Technical Data Middle, at Fort Belvoir, Virginia, in an effort
to seek out out whether or not any corroborating proof—apart from the movie
itself—existed.

Based on my very credible supply, a now-declassified, however as but
unreleased radar information report of the September 15, 1964 missile launch was
found, which confirmed the monitoring of an unidentified aerial object close to
the dummy warhead on the time of the incident.

Evaluation contained within the radar abstract apparently thought of the likelihood
that the “object” was really particles of some variety. Jacobs has said that
when the warhead separated from the missile booster, it had been surrounded by
a subject of metallic chaff—along with the check being performed—that
was nonetheless seen within the digital camera body on the time of the UFO’s look. The
Air Drive needed to know whether or not embedding airborne warheads in chaff, throughout
an precise battle, would forestall the Soviets from figuring out the warheads’ precise
positions on their very own radars.

So, maybe the mysterious goal tracked on radar close to the warhead was merely
the chaff. Alternatively, it could have certainly been the precise UFO, whose
presence the creator of the radar information report would in all probability not have identified
about, given the incident’s Prime Secret standing.

Regardless, in a single Nineteen Eighties-era
letter
written by Dr. Florenze Mansmann—who was by then a part-time biomedical
engineering researcher at Stanford College—he confirmed that his
frame-by-frame evaluation of the movie with a Loupe magnifier, performed shortly
after the missile warhead check, revealed the UFO to be “[a] basic disc, the
heart appeared to be a raised bubble…the whole decrease saucer form was
glowing and appeared to be rotating slowly. On the level of beam launch…the
object turned like an object required to be ready to fireplace from a
platform…however once more this may very well be my very own assumption from being in aerial
fight.” Mansmann’s up to date analysis of the UFO’s origin was specific:
“…the belief was, at the moment, extraterrestrial.”

The Large Sur UFO Incident is arguably probably the most dramatic case on report of
obvious UFO interference with one in all our nuclear weapon techniques. As such, its
significance can’t be overstated. Whereas the precise motivation underlying what
Jacobs has known as ”the capturing down” of the dummy warhead stays
unknown—he has speculated that it was designed to convey somebody’s displeasure
over our possession of nuclear weapons—the act itself was however
unmistakably provocative and, from a technological perspective, completely
astounding.

Half 2 of this text to be posted quickly.